[John Atkinson]

On Jun 5, 12:32 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Jun 5, 4:04 am, John Atkinson
wrote:
At the time (1983), Larry requested that his original manuscript
not be republished, only quoted from.

What an absolute crock.

No, it was the truth.

If Greenhill isn't willing to be open and completely forthcoming,
then the whole story is moot IMO and all your claims of Stereo
Review bias remain unsubstantiated.

You can compare both versions of the conclusions, one
as written by the author, the second as edited and rewritten
by Stereo Review's editors, both of which are included in
the reprint of the 1983 Stereophile article, and make up
your own mind about our claims, ScottW. You can also
examine the test data provided in the Stereo Review pdf,
to see if supports the conclusion drawn by Stereo Review's
editors.

Only way you can anwer my questions is by
releasing the whole thing. Otherwise,
another golden ear will be cherry picked from
reams of random trials.

I certainly believe in people being skeptical about what
they read, ScottW, but you are taking skepticism to
a ridiculous extreme, IMO.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile