[ScottW]

On Jun 5, 4:04 am, John Atkinson
wrote:
On Jun 4, 9:42 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

"John Atkinson" wrote in message
ups.com...
you're willing to link to Stereo Review's original, but fail to fill in the
gaps with the missing segments from Greenhills original.

At the time (1983), Larry requested that his original manuscript not
be republished, only quoted from.

Any you hired this guy? Why am I not surprised?

What an absolute crock. If Greenhill isn't willing to be open and
completely forthcoming, then the whole story is moot IMO and
all your claims of Stereo Review bias remain unsubstantiated.

There is always something with you guys to cloud things up
unnecessarily.
You're worse than the Bush administration from a DailyKos
POV.

Somewhere in the my boxes of old
files, I have the manuscript.

Greenhill dead or what? Get his approval to publish the thing
on your web site in its entirety or burn it.

When and if I find it, I can answer your
questions.

Only way you can anwer my questions is by
releasing the whole thing. Otherwise,
another golden ear will be cherry picked from
reams of random trials.

ScottW