[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

Soundhaspriority wrote:
JBorg, Jr.wrote
Soundhaspriority wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote


I don't have anything against SR, in fact, I got interested in
audio early on from reading the mag and their product reviews. I
didn't know that they are so mean.

"Are?" "Are?"

I was attributing that to SR's editorial staff whom I refer to as
"they" which I presume are still around, instead of "it" -- the
nonexistent mag.

It hasn't been published since 1999.

Good.

But the inability of consumer interest to support the magazine is
bad. I do find it puzzling that a nonpolitical magazine would find
it necessary to "take a line" and "spin the truth."


How do you mean 'spin the truth'? What other motivation would you
suggest SR's editorial staff had in mind to sandbag Greenhill's
report. I find that the issue concerns 'fair play' and striking
prevarication to deceive the public at large.


I was an avid reader of Stereo Review. What else could I aspire to as
a college kid? And I'll tell you another thing: the sound wasn't very
good, but the pleasure was sweeter.


You could aspire that sound has priority.


Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(215) 646-4894