View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
JBorg, Jr.[_2_] JBorg, Jr.[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 353
Default L.Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51

Soundhaspriority wrote:
John Atkinson wrote


Just a note that Stereophile's analysis of the differences
between Larry Greenhill's orginal manuscript and the
version that was published in Stereophile Review has
been posted in Stereophile's on-line archives
http://www.stereophile.com/historical/1283cable/ .

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Oh, no! JA, this is "fire season". We could lose thousands of acres
over this!



It is there for all to see that Greenhill's original report and compilation
were hijacked and carefully misrepresented to suit Stereo Review's
editorial standpoint, which is -- a committement of badmouthing high-end
audio, something like that.

I also read that Larry Greenhill said during that time that he had trouble
ascribing thoughts to Stereo Review's editorial staff.

I don't have anything against SR, in fact, I got interested in audio early
on from reading the mag and their product reviews. I didn't know that
they are so mean.



Bob Morein
Dresher, PA
(215) 646-4894