On May 29, 12:23 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in
message
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in
message
y.
com
In article
,
It is well known that some people are far more
sensitive to FM distortion than others. And, there's
no correlation between this ability or curse, and
perfect pitch.
How does one perceive FM distortion other than in the
realm of frequency?
Your obvious error Jenn is that you think that human
perception in the frequency domain works only one way.
If that were true, nobody could ever tell the
difference between a tone being on-pitch and a tone
with vibrato.
You didn't answer the question: how does one perceive
FM distortion other than in the realm of frequency?
Your question would be a rhetorical question if you knew
what the F in FM means, Jenn.
Of course I know what it means, Arny.
Of course not, Jenn. You showed that you don't know what FM means when you
asked for an answer to a rhetorical question involving it.
I didn't ask a rhetorical question.
Since you seem to be demanding an actual answer,
Wow, shocking!
No, proof that you didn't know that it was a rhetorical question, Jenn.
your gross
ignorance of even common topics in audio is further
revealed.
You stated that sensitivity to FM distortion bears no
correlation to "perfect pitch".
True.
Perfect pitch involves a determination of absolute frequency.
Sensitivity to FM distortion, for example the vibrato that is inherent in LP
playback, involves determination of relative and changing frequencies.
Two different things.
Thanks for admitting that you have no idea of what "perfect pitch" means.
So what does perfect pitch mean?
Does this guy have it or not?
http://www.dfan.org/pitch.html
I know perfect pitch is not necessary to be sensitive to
wow & flutter.
ScottW