[[email protected]]

On Apr 3, 5:06 pm, dizzy wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 2, 7:36 pm, dizzy wrote:
wrote:
Why do you bother? Did you ever hear of anyone swaying the true
believers?

Yeah, it's pretty hard to do, when you're clearly in the wrong.

========

Last time I heard an argument of this kind was in my kindergarten
days.
"You are wrong"
"No, YOU are wrong"
" But YOU are CLEARLY wrong. That's much worse"

Maybe you should learn how to read. You brought up the RAHE debate.
You know where it is. Read it. There's no need for me to add to what
has already been written.

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear Mr. Dizzy,
You've taken trouble to confirm my point.The brrighter kindergarten
kids can already read but they are not reading advanced thinkers and
electronic luminaries like Krueger, Sullivan, NYOB and undoubtedly
you. When they do grow up to the elementary school level they no
longer waste time on a battered, beaten to death boring topic- not for
four decades ,they do not.

Before this rererere"debate" gets into its usual endless spin a few
simple definitions. Both for you and Mr. Krueger

What an "article" is not?. It is not a ONE SENTENCE mention of future
accompilishments.
What it is. It is the titled, signed account of the experiments
performed using the defined test protocol (ABX in this case) that
demonstrate4 that it is a superior tool for distinguishing and
appraising the musical performance of audio components.

What is a scientifically significant article.? It is an article
accepted for publication by a journal authoritative in this field.

What is of no interest to a nonprofessional audiophile group". The
news that that protocol is useful for assesing codecs, phase
differences and such

What is of interest to such a group?. The news that there is a test
superior to their concentrated listening and to the judgement of the
(few)critics that they learnt to trust

What no one sane would object to? Listening blind.if it helps anyone
to concentrate. Many concert goers do..

What do sane people object to.? Being bothered with a supposed "test"
that always end up with "it all sounds the same" verdict.

What else? Seeing Chairman Krueger for the nth. splitting verbal hairs
instead of talking to the subject..
Ludovic Mirabel