[dizzy]

Signal wrote:

dizzy wrote:

Signal wrote:

99c is too much for a single track download already IMO, considering
the lower overheads involved vs a hard copy, the compromised quality,
lack of liner notes/artwork.

Not if, like so many CD's, there's only a couple really good songs
with having...

I suppose, but how keen are you on paying extortionate prices? My
point is with significantly lower overheads, downloads should cost
less. At $1.30 per track, majors are laughing all the way to the bank.

I smoke cigars that cost $10. $1.30 for a really good song is a
bargain, IMO.

The increased quality plus the lack of DRM makes me MUCH more likely
to download music. I was kind of ticked-off when I first tried
itunes, and quickly learned that I could not play the song that I just
payed-for on another PC (withoug jumping through hoops). Plus,
128kb/s is quite lame.

I think this is a great step foward.