On Apr 3, 1:38 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
wrote in message
On Apr 3, 5:04 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com
When did anyone ever see an article accepted by the
editors of thre Journ. of the Audio Eng. Socy. which
validated this way of comparing audio components. The
patient web is another matter.** Anything goes there.
Clark, David L., "High-Resolution Subjective Testing
Using a Double-Blind Comparator", Journal of the Audio
Engineering Society, Vol. 30 No. 5, May 1982, pp.
330-338.
Exactly as I predicted. Krueger is up again with Clark's
article about ABXing.
Letsee
(1) It is a JAES article
(2) Publishing this article is the JAES's way of validating the methodology
for its members
Letsee.
That would be very unusual, Arns.
Typically, publication in a refereed journal simply means that it
seems to have met the conditions to throw it to others to see if the
procedure is repeatable or valid. It is not "validating the
methodology" in any way.
Remember this? Did the journal "Science" validate this for their
members?
"He made news around the world when he announced in August that his
team had created the world's first cloned dog.
The veracity of that research, as well as an earlier paper on the
first cloning of a human embryo, will now be subject to review by the
same panel, says the BBC's Charles Scanlon in Seoul.
SCANDAL TIMELINE
Feb 2004 Hwang Woo-suk's team declare they have created 30 cloned
human embryos
May 2005 Team says it has made stem cell lines from skin cells of 11
people
Nov 2005 Hwang apologises for using eggs from his own researchers
Dec 15 A colleague claims stem cell research was faked
Dec 23 Academic panel finds results were 'intentionally fabricated'
Profile: Hwang Woo-suk
In May, Dr Hwang published a paper in the journal Science, saying his
team had extracted material from cloned human embryos that identically
matched the DNA of 11 patients.
It was claimed such a technique could be the key to providing
personalised cures.
But the university panel said that all 11 sets of data were derived
from only two stem cell lines.
The panel said it still did not know whether those two stem cell
clusters had actually been cloned.
"Based on these findings, data in the 2005 Science journal cannot be
regarded as a simple accidental error but as intentional fabrication
made out of two stem cells," the investigators said.
"This is a serious wrongdoing that has damaged the foundation of
science," it said."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asi...ic/4554422.stm