[[email protected]]

On Apr 3, 11:38 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com





On Apr 3, 5:04 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com

When did anyone ever see an article accepted by the
editors of thre Journ. of the Audio Eng. Socy. which
validated this way of comparing audio components. The
patient web is another matter.** Anything goes there.

Clark, David L., "High-Resolution Subjective Testing
Using a Double-Blind Comparator", Journal of the Audio
Engineering Society, Vol. 30 No. 5, May 1982, pp.
330-338.
Exactly as I predicted. Krueger is up again with Clark's
article about ABXing.

Letsee

(1) It is a JAES article
(2) Publishing this article is the JAES's way of validating the methodology
for its members

The article is about all the possible technical uses of
ABX.

Including comparing audio components.

There is not ONE SINGLE WORD about comparing the audio
components' music reproduction abilities by listening tests,

The article mentions comparing audio components as a possible use for ABX.

protocols used,

The article describes the ABX test protocol, which is the protocol used.

examples and results.

The article describes examples of the use of ABX.

You see it Krueger? Quote it..

Not my job to repeat what I've done in the past for the sake of those who
are intentionally blind to it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
--------------------------------------------

The weaseling liar "answers":
I said:
There is not ONE SINGLE WORD about comparing the audio
components' music reproduction abilities by listening tests,

The article mentions comparing audio components as a possible use for ABX.

And that "mention" of a "possible use" in an 1982 article is all the
"validation" that the grand priest of the ABX chapel can quote.
Apparentlr Krueger never got the news about Roger Bacon centuries old
defining of experimental ,method in science.
Ludovic Mirabel
..