[Arny Krueger]

"Harry Lavo" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in
message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
net
My Bach Cantata project took several steps forward
yesterday when I received in the mail 8 LPs,
covering 16 cantatas, including 13 that I didn't
have. I now only have about 18 to go to have a
full set. I sure love these works. The present
LPs are from the Harnoncourt/Concentus Musicus
complete edition on Telefunken. Telefunken LPs
have never appeared much on the "Super Recordings"
lists, but I find their sound (in general) to be
very, very, natural. Highly recommended.

It's almost 80 degrees here today, but I think that
I might stay inside and listen to these fabulous
recordings while doing my taxes ;-)

Maybe if you think real hard Jennifer, you could
find a newsgroup where this sort of post is on-topic.

Discussing a record label in terms of recorded sound
quality? RAO?

Is the SQ of recordings a technical or an musical
artistic/administrative question?

Yes.

Wrong. It's completely a musical artistic/administrative
question given that we have so many forms of digital
media that are sonically transparent.

Just remember that not all media is as badly audibly flawed as the vinyl
LP.

Once again, Arny "assumes" the answer, despite a large
number of professional sound people who disagree with
him.

Harry, since when have you been a technically superior authority as compared
to the JAES?

When challenged, he will cite a) "science is on my side",

Harry can't directly refute the scientific explanations that I've presented.

b) his college ee textbooks citing that "96 db is enough",

I've never seen any such thing in a college texdtbook, but if Harry wants to
clear his name, he could cite one just to prove that he hasn't been caught
in yet another like.

c) his pcm-only abx website.

Given that SACD has failed so thoroughly in the marketplace, why should I
invest more good money in SACD hardware,or ask others to make the same
mistake that I did?

But he won't provide any hard evidence,

Harry's lying again. I've provided plenty evidence. He's never directly
refuted it.

because he has never done a
bonafide listening test of audio components comparing CD
to any hi-rez system,

Yet another lie. In fact I was listening to a 9.2 hi-rez system on Saturday
night, and that was hardly the first. I have done extensive controlled
listening tests on a system that runs cleanly up to 24/192.

and based on scarcity of comment,
it is doubtful that he has done even any informal but
careful listening testing using native DSD (although
while not the best his Sony C775 and his system should be
adequate to reveal it).

Where did I say I had a Sony C775?

This has to be another one of Harry's delusions.