rec.audio.dbt
"Dennis Moore" wrote in message
news:xmg0b.149774$Oz4.41175@rwcrnsc54
Do you think the name of RAHE could be changed to
rec.audio.dbt?
I agree with you. Or rec.audio.same-old-arguments.
Sure seems that by far the great bulk of the messages end
up about dbt's.
Mostly originating from failed attempts to criticize DBTs.
You could look with that 95% confidence
you will mostly be reading about dbts. Pro's and cons, believers
and non-believers etc. etc.
Just to make a point, what does it mean to not believe in DBTs? If someone
believes in God, that means that he believes that God exists. Is there
anyone who seriously doesn't believe in the existence of DBTs?
How about it? Would be more honest than calling it high-end
when the practices of the high-end industry are regularly
denigrated by posters here.
Is that denigrated or criticized? It seems like criticism of *any* audio
segment is conceivably on-topic here.
And the moderators don't seem to
be high-enders for the most part.
Say what?
[Moderator's Note: That's news to us. RD]
A simple change in the FAQ could make it all clear too.
Without compromising the right to free speech on the part of the same old,
same old people who start these threads?
|