Thread
:
sound decade ?
View Single Post
#
38
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
Roy W. Rising
external usenet poster
Posts: 385
sound decade ?
wrote:
Roy W. Rising wrote:
wrote:
Roy W. Rising wrote:
"Mike Rivers" wrote:
On Feb 25, 1:12 pm, Roy W. Rising wrote:
The relationship you mention is "Let the product of the LF and HF
-3dB frequencies equal 600,000". Familiar examples are 30-20,000Hz;
Oh, well, there goes 50 years of "20 to 20,000 cycles" shot to hell.
There's not much music below 30 Hz, only a few pipe organs.
That is not true. There are kick drums and electric bass
guitars, electronic synthesizers and all manner of stuff between say,
100 Hz and 30 Hz.
snip
Your point being ... ? I said BELOW 30 Hz.
I meant *below* 30 Hz as well. I did not type that, but I should have.
All we need to know is that when somebody removes it on the
right program material thru the right playback, its absence is
apparent. Doesn't happen often.
I understand your "oops". I once had an editor who would change "increase"
to "decrease" and such. His boss took care of that problem!
All things considered, 15-40,000 is a realistic range for electronics, and
meets the 600,000 rule.
--
~ Roy
"If you notice the sound, it's wrong!"
Reply With Quote
Roy W. Rising
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Roy W. Rising