"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
. ..
Sorry Arny for catching you out in yet another web of
deception and puffery.
But thanks for confirming it, no matter how
inadvertently.
Note that Harry has already awarded himself victory on
the grounds that he has conclusively proven that the
article I claimed most certainly does not exist.
Too bad I found a reference to it at
http://www.nleindex.com
Straw men burning everywhere.
As usual Harry won't stand behind his recent statements.
Show me where I said, much
less have conclusively claimed to have proven, that the
article doesn't exist.
What's unclear about:
"Sorry Arny for catching you out in yet another web of
deception and puffery."
I implied it was possible, given
your past track record. You have given a citation. I
have looked it up. An article as cited exists. The
citation doesn't include authors names so we have only
your word that you are one of the authors...and that
should be enough, except that in the past you have made
similar claims that turned out not to be true.
Nonsense. Prove the existence of even one of them Harry
or admit that you are an insufferable liar.
So a little scepticism is warrented.
Nahh Harry, you can't stand to think that in the case of
using electret mics for recording and measurements, I'm
more than 20 years ahead of you.
The main point, however, is that you have already
admitted the article doesn't deal in any relevant way
with the implication you wished to give by mentioning it
in the first place....
What implication? The one you fantasized? LOL!
implying that somehow the Niaint
Mic wasn't worthy of a second thought because you had
already "invented it" 20 years prior.
Another fantasy. The Niaint mic is what it is. It's a
cheap, stripped down version of a very cheap but more
complete and probably better-designed mic.
When in fact you hadn't.
What fact? Show where I said that I built a mic with
phantom power support and balanced output, Harry. Do
that or admit that you're a habitual insufferable liar.
Your mic was an electret measurement microphone.
That several of us, including myself used for recording.
The Niaint is a balanced, phantom-powered recording
microphone.
So it is. So what?
Now, I'll really **** you off Harry. The mic design
that my friend and I came up with over 20 years ago was
some years later used in a ground-breaking measurement
technique which was described in an AES paper. Have a nice day, Harry!
;-)
My last word, Arny.
We should all be so lucky!
You dragged a peripheral project of
yours (however laudible) into a rec.audio.pro.live-sound
thread when it wasn't relevant, simply to imply that the
mics under discussion -- the Naiant -- were "old stuff".
The Naint is old news. It might be new to you Harry, but it was old news,
even as an eBay product.
When the only relevance to what you did twenty years ago
was to perhaps use the same capsule.
Harry it was most certainly *not* the same capsule, because the capsule we
used has been out of production for a decade or more. Wanna try again and
maybe at least say *something* right?
It showed your insufferable ego, however weak it is that it requires
bolstering through puffery.
What to say about someone who makes this kind of fuss over a statement that
was entirely factual, even on several different levels?
Wounded ego, pure and simple.