[paul packer]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:23:21 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

In article ,
(paul packer) wrote:

On 19 Feb 2007 09:30:37 -0800, "Jenn"
wrote:


P.S. I forgot to mention that the Mercury re-release is the worst of
the many of that recording. IIRC, it was done just before everything
changed at Mercury, and this recording shows some of the negative
effects of that change.

Eh?

lol I admit that this is, umm, less than clear. I shouldn't post
before breakfast! Take 2:

1. There are several releases of this recording
2. This one is the worst sounding
3. At the time of release, Mercury was changing administration and
other staff, and this may be the reason that several Mercury recordings
of this era don't sound as good as previous releases.

Got it that time.