On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 04:32:05 GMT, "Harry Lavo"
wrote:

"normanstrong" wrote in message
news:lfaWa.29024$uu5.3508@sccrnsc04...
Golly, after reading the entire article, I'm impressed. Faced with
these results, it's pretty hard to attack McLaren's article as being
poor science.

http://www.tagmclaren.com/members/news/news77.asp

I see nothing in the results that is inconsistent with the hypothesis
that there are no audible differences in both the cables and amps.

Then you have not looked closely at and thought about some of this
results/issues I have raised.

They have indeed been closely examined, and your distortions and wild
speculations have been debunked by several posters.

Now, since the TAG results are yet another nail in your 'everything
sounds different' coffin, exactly where is there one single *shred* of
evidence to support your position?

As a sad footnote, it must be observed that TAG-McLaren is one of the
very few 'high end' companies which brought genuine engineering talent
to bear on an attempt to improve the quality of music reproduction in
the home, backed by considerable financial muscle. Regrettably (but
perhaps predictably), they found that honesty and skill were *not* the
way to make money in so-called 'high end' audio. R.I.P.......
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering