[paul packer]

On 7 Feb 2007 01:36:51 -0800, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

On Feb 6, 9:39 pm, (paul packer) wrote:
On 6 Feb 2007 16:01:14 -0800, "ScottW" wrote:





On Feb 6, 3:47 pm, (paul packer) wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:20:25 -0500, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:

Arnii "en-juh-near" Krooger plops on a newbie.

Get a can of good electronic contact cleaner

What Arnii means, of course, is that all electronic contact cleaners are
equally good and cannot be distinguished in properly-bias-controlled,
dosage-matched, spray-synchronized DBTs. Imputations of quality connoted
by loaded words like "good", "bad", "honest", "human", etc. are completely
inappropriate to debates involving siccncnceccee.

Now, George, Arnie was being helpful here---IOW, behaving well. If you
attack him during periods of good, helpful behaviour he'll get
confused as to what is expected of him, resulting no doubt in a
snowstorm of snot. Will this be a Good thing? I think not.

Come on Paul, don't be naive. George lives for snowstorms of snot.
He trolls for them almost daily.

ScottW

Hmmm....grain of truth time perhaps....

But...ALMOST DAILY, did you say? Surely you meant moment to moment.

Caig DeoxIT.

http://store.caig.com/s.nl/sc.2/category.188/.f

Thread over.

Now back to your 'hifi' Paul. Heaven forbid that you admit it's just
preference.

Please don't put my hi-fi in inverted commas. It's very sensitive.