Daniel wrote:
Steven Sullivan wrote in message ...
Dennis Moore wrote:
So changing labels on a product, giving the same product to a
customer, who you have gone out of your way to mislead into
thinking is a different product when it is the same isn't sleight
of hand? Okay, what is it? It isn't truthful.

You're complaining about THIS, in the face of the rather
dubious claims routinely made in the advertisements
found every month in audio magazines?

Care to name a few?

I'll be happy to, when I have the magazines at hand, later.

But before we start, do you *seriously* believe that hi-fi advertising
does *not* routinely include dubious claims? Have you ever seen *any* ads
for high end cables? Do you believe the ad copy therein?

Heck, read the white papers at high-end cable mfr sites, which
presumably are more rigorously worded than ad copy.
For example

http://www.taralabs.com/white_papers...ce_Design1.asp

Lots of claims about audible effects, and even a claim about a testing
methodm, but no proof offered-- NONE -- that the effects are really
audible.