[paul packer]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:59:36 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:07:54 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message

On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:57:59 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
ups.com

But Hirsch was a notorious apologist for the status
quo.

As opposed to Bret Ludwig who is a notorious apologist
for retrograde technology? ;-)

Trying to make new friends again, Arny?

Yeah Paul, I guess you must think that Bret just started
posting here.

Irrelevant, Arnold. The fact that Bret is a long-time
poster doesn't justify you attacking him for no real
cause.

Irrelevant Paul, because that wasn't the issue that the statement that your
previous post addressed.

Eh? That wasn't the statement that the issue that the previous
post....eh?

It's very Middius-like of you to try to change what you said, given that it
was irrelevant to the situation between Bret and I.

Firstly, Middius doesn't change what he says--quite the opposite.
Secondly, it wasn't irrelevant. You attacked Bret. If it was an old
grievance....

This is a fight that Bret started way back when.

Okay then....

The fact that you know his views on hi-fi doesn't
justify you attacking him for no real cause.

I've got plenty of cause - his initial gratuitous attacks, and his sour
behavior since then.

And you remember it all, don't you? I responded to your post only
because it was so typical; it sums up why you're constantly in flame
wars. If you could see that, much would change.

Your siege mentality is showing again.

How Middius-like of you Paul.

Do you really think only Middius believes you have a seige mentality?

I have no siege mentality in general. However
it is well-known among the audio grouups on Usenet that RAO is populated by
idiots and fools such as you, your buddy the Middiot, and Bret.

Anybody who would use the phrase "you, your buddy the Middiot" is not
reading the posts or taking in what he reads. Haven't you noticed that
George and I agree on nothing, except perhaps that you have a seige
mentality? There is no conspiracy here, Arnie. There never was. Write
it on the board a hundred times:

THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY ON RAO
THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY ON RAO
THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY ON RAO
THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY ON RAO
THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY ON RAO

There's the first five for you. Please carry on.......