OK, toopid, I took your criticism to heart...
In article .com,
"ScottW" wrote:
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
ScottW wrote:
George M. Middius wrote:
MiNe 109 said:
Highly suspect, starting with the zero-sum premise and ending
with the
appearance of cherry-picking.
I was referring of our country's shameful non-response to HIV and
AIDS under
Reagan. Where did you find a zero-sum premise on that page?
Where it says AIDS is over-funded. What's it to other diseases that
AIDS
gets some funding?
Gotcha. Isn't it well-established that AIDS is a plague on the homos
from
God hisself?
He's ****ed cuz West Nile wins.
Typical sideways argument. Whatever happened to that Jamail guy?
Is he the one who accused American soldiers of shooting up
hospitals in
Iraq?
Maybe: he told AP Iraqis doused other Iraqis with kerosene, except
that
according to Scott's sources he doesn't exist.
Scottie also believes in DBTs for consumers. His personal credibility
gap
reminds me of the Grand Canyon.
Figures you'd base a personal credibility on something so silly.
Anyway, reality (which I'm sure you care little about) is
I'd like to see DBTs from reviewers.
So toopid: is someone who is gay making a choice to be gay?
Some are...some aren't....snip
I've never known any gay people who made such a choice.
|