[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...

I am sounding like someone who understands that it is very dangerous to
have the majority in the form of a popular vote decide rights for a
minority. Debate is a good thing. Passion and emotion are not
necessarily a good thing. A representative republic like the US elects
representatives to make those decisions. People get mad that things
don't happen fast enough in Washington, but in some cases those
time-delays allow for thorough examination of issues and the thoughtful
debate that you say I do not want. That's where that type of debate
belongs, not in the world of one minute long political TV ads paid for
by PACs.

How well does this work in Pelosi's tax the rich to pay the poor world?

So, (assuming that your generalization about Pelosi is indeed correct)
in your 'mind,' tax rates and civil rights are equivalent?

What a sad little man you are.