"Robert Morein" wrote in message


"Powell" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote

[snip]

We've got to remember that Morein tried to sue his
school in the Supreme Court of the United States in a
failed attempt to get a PhD degree. This is one
seriously and expensively bruised ego.

Two litigous fruitcakes, masters of denial, umm patting each other on the
err, backs:

As one who has invested substantial funds in attorney
fees as a necessary expense of doing business I can
appreciate Robert's disposition on the matter. I have
respect for anyone who has been thought the financial
commitment of litigation and psychological hardships
they can cause.

While it is sport to dig Robert I don't believe it is a
reflection of any greater truth of moral or ethical quality.
Two metaphors to consider "A man who carries a cat by
the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
- Mark Twain", and Voltaire who said "I was never ruined
but twice; once when I lost a lawsuit, and once when I
won one."

Apparently Powell hasn't learned much from his experiences.

The only way to truely win a lawsuit is to get more money out of your
opponent than the lawyers gets out of you. Sometimes you get the
opponent'smoney, sometimes your opponent just spends more money with his
lawyer. Been there, done that twice. Done it both ways.

Like his RAO cohort in legal failure Scott Wheeler,
Morien's case got thrown out of court.

My case didn't get thrown out of court.

Sure it did.

http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/suprem...22403pzor.html
shows:

CERTIORARI DENIED - 02-863 MOREIN, ROBERT V. DREXEL UNIV., ET AL.

http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossa...certiorari.htm

Defines CERTIORARI DENIED. It means that the court refused to hear your
case, Morein. IOW, your case was thrown out of court. In essence, its the
same thing that happened to Scott Wheeler's case.


snip smoke screen