Note for Scooter
Yapper bellows his epochal ignorance to the entire world.
Interesting response. It's mostly a nonsequitur, partly a troll, and
partly further evidence of your intractable stupidity.
Tell you what: I'll explain what you ask right after you explain why a
newspaper's ombudsman publishing public corrections of errors is "bad".
Repeatedly requiring corrections, failing to follow fact checking
policy, editors denial as their first response to complaints and
refusing to retract denial in the face of the facts......is bad.
Then why aren't you criticizing every newspaper in the country? Are you
aware of the New York Post's or the Washington Times' "fact checking
policies"? Are their "policies" more lax or more rigorous than the
NYTimes' policy?
The fact that the ombudsman is the source of these revelations doesn't
alter their existance[sic].
Really, Scottie, this is getting tedious. Two or three other posters have
smacked you in the face with the gaping holes in your "logic", and still
you repeat the same discredited bull****. After all these embarassments,
don't you think it's time to seriously consider the possibility that
there's something wrong with your "thought" processes?
--
Lionella loves the Krooborg from afar. With mud on top.
|