AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - Upgrade path

From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 7/16/2004 12:36 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 7/16/2004 11:36 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"Powell" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote

"Joseph Oberlander" wrote

The two amplifiers you have are overkill - you don't
need to biamp...

What is the basis for this comment? There is no such
thing as an amp that is too big (watts per channel).

If you really believed this Powell, you'd 5 KW per
channel amps, wall-to-wall. So, do you?

Archive-name: AudioFAQ/part4

11.6 Is this amplifier too big for that set of speakers?
There is no such thing as an amplifier that is too big.
Small amplifiers are more likely to damage speakers
than large ones, because small amplifiers are more
likely to clip than larger ones, at the same listening
level. I have never heard of speakers being damaged
by an overly large amplifier.

This has been debunked any number of times, including
AES papers that I've cited here many times.

Hehehe... sure, whatever you say, mr. Empty Pockets.

Are you suggesting that my pockets are less full than yours because
I've spend more on audio gear? Might be true.

Let's compare microphone closets and mic preamp collections...

;-)

Gee Arny, why don't you just go for the sure win and challenge Powell
to an obsolete sound card collection contest?

Because it would be even more like taking candy from a child.

I suppose so. I can't thing of anyone whose collection of obsolete sound cards
comes close to yours.

Sort of like
beating you in court without raising a finger...

You never beat me in court Arny. I let the case go. You didn't have the balls
to show up in court.

Well if you want to get Powell into a ****ing contest why don't you just stick
with things that interest most audiophiles such as your playback system or
music collection?