Arny Krueger a écrit :

"Lionel" wrote in message


In this endless need of power and victory our terminator serial number
S888Wheel (it comes after the S887Wheel and obviously before the
S889Wheel) has answered that to a Pinkerton's post on RAHE :

"That is an interesting perspective you have on art. It is clearly
wrong but interesting. There are objective standards in art. They may
not be as cut and dry as they are in engineering but the exist. That
doesn't mean there is anything wrong with someone liking bad art.
Objective standards in art exist independent of taste."


"Please, tell us more about *these objective standards*.


What is bad art ? How can art be bad ?


For myself I pretend that art hopefully escapes to all standards and
belongs to irrational."


Lionel, your points are well taken.

Take art, add objective standards, and you just might have a craft.

To understand S888wheel's position, it might help were he to make his
*profession* known.

S888Wheel profession ?
I guess he is a kind of "wind salesman" who make money from nothing.
It's not really difficult to understnad since he puts so many barriers
from him and the common human being.
This guys is trying to explain us that art answers to "objective
standards" and he try to make us understand using subjective words like
"bad art"... LOL
It's like if you want to explains the "theory of the cordes" using 1st
degree equation only ! )

S888wheel is a living *joke* !