[Powell]

"Arny Krueger" wrote

I understand the meanign of a 192/24 samples recording..

24/192 is the highest resolution used in commercial
recordings. It represents vast overkill. Think of it as
having a car that will go 155 mph.

Hehehe... right, you said that about ISA vs PCI sound
cards, too.

Powell, you seem to be slipping into senility. I corrected you about that
at least once before.

You think. It goes back to 1998.

snip quacking


BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Rubbish.


Haven't produced_commercial_ recordings.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Rubbish. I doubt you even know what a ISBN is
or could produce one.


Not a member of any professional recording/engineering society or even
subscribed to any recording magazines.

That would be untrue.

More rubbish. You lied to Atkinson and me about
your readily available library access to AES journals,
too.


Indeed you're not reading RAO very well - Ludo just lately managed to find
a reference to a technical article
that I wrote for a recording engineering magazine some years ago.

Zzzzz... Where are all your ABX articles you
claimed to have written? No guessing required,
just more rubbish.


How is it that you are so intimately familiar with commercial recording
going-ons (24/192) to form such an uninformed opinion?

Note: no response from Arny, just cowering.