Thread
:
Better Than ABX?
View Single Post
#
23
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Bill Riel
external usenet poster
Posts: 268
Better Than ABX?
In article ,
says...
said:
- Ever seen someone with 5.1 ears? So, what does that tell you? -
It tells me that you don't care for the fact that ears are perfectly
capable of hearing 5 or more separate sources of sound, and that you
may not have ever heard a properly set up 5.1 setup.
Delusions of omniscience noted (© Arny Krueger).
I only listen to music, for which stereo is enough in my case.
I don't need weird, artificial reflections from the rear and a booming
sub to go with it.
Hi Sander,
I'd never be critical of anyone's preferences, and I do tend to do
almost all of my listening in 2 channel as well. However, I have heard
some music in 5.1 that was very impressive - usually the best will be
classical music and the surrounds simply provide hall ambience and can
be a tremendously immersive experience.
I've heard some nice jazz that way, too, though I hate it when
instruments get mixed to the surrounds.
If properly set up, subs shouldn't "boom" (well, perhaps except in
movies). But, imo, it's actually non-trivial to position and "dial-in" a
sub properly so it blends seamlessly. When it does, you shouldn't even
know that it's on - you just get tremendous, clean bass extension.
Anyway, I'm not trying to lecture you - I know you've forgotten more
about audio than I'll ever know, but 5.1 can be a pretty amazing
experience with the right source & setup imo.
--
Bill
Reply With Quote
Bill Riel
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Bill Riel