[[email protected]]

Where did we stop in Act 2:

Mirabel, I don't have time for the likely unending debate over the
difference between comparing and differentiating.

Except that it is not about that at all. It is about your quoting;:
" ..a paper by David Clark
as your ONLY piece of evidence that ABX for listening to and
DIFFERENTIATING audio components is research-backed and
validated. As I predicted that paper did
not have one word to say about the subject.

And your answer?
As I said Clark followed a
different approach from the one you've made after the fact.

If he "followed a different approach" and you still can not quote any
results what on earth did you quote his paper as your ONLY etc.
etc.....Where is your EVIDENCE?

Tell the truth Krueger. You thought you could get the real subject
derailed into the idiot level semantics, didn't you?

Krueger: there is no debate. There's just pinning down a huckster of
quack audio remedies.
I did not expect that an experienced peddler like you would run out of
stuffing so soon.
You tried running " my articles in JAES" up the pole. Shot down
because you could not name ONE.
Next you trumpeted the mysteries of engineering English inaccessible
to mere foreigners like myself. But you are getting my English now, I
hope..
You tried insults: "ignorance", "senility" whatever.
Go mute as many times as you like. If you don't huckster you'll have
immunity. If you restart under whatever clever-clever cryptonim (eg.
"bias controlled test" etc) you'll hear from me again
..
Ludovic Mirabel