Thread
:
Spread of costs..
View Single Post
#
35
Lionel
Posts: n/a
Spread of costs..
S888Wheel a écrit :
From: Lionel
ahc
Date: 6/21/2004 3:25 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:
S888Wheel - - mardi 22 Juin
2004 00:13 wrote:
From: Lionel
ahc
Date: 6/21/2004 2:52 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:
S888Wheel - - lundi 21 Juin
2004 23:23 wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 6/21/2004 1:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:
"JBorg" wrote in message
Paul Dormer wrote:
I would be interested to see how ppl spread their costs across
components. Here's mine, expressed as ratio. I nominated CD in this
example as it's my most used source.
[CD : AMP : SPEAKERS]
1 : 6 : 12
Speakers ------ 17%
Pwr Amp ------- 17%
PreAmp -------- 18%
CD ------------- 17%
Subw ----------- 15%
Pwr
Conditioner ------ 8%
Just goes to show that you can't ask JBorg a simple question and get a
proper answer. Ask for 3 numbers and he gives you six. Furthermore, it
appears that he apparently can't do the simple math required to express
his results as the ratios that were asked for.
I don't think 3 numbers were specifically asked for. Just a breakdown on
costs of components. His numbers do break down into simple ratios.
Lionel was the only one to screw that one up. Even his was a minor screw
up. There is the missing 8% though. Accessories? Bad math?
Dormer requested a ratio.
A ratio is a ratio. The most popular in the world is named "percent" this
is the one I use like Mr. Borg... But it seems that he lost some bolts &
nuts in way.
Yeah but you didn't break yours down to the lowest common denominator.
JBorg's were broken down so all one had to do is ignore the % symbol and
the answer was there. Yours required a little bit of extra math to be
finished. No big deal.
You should stop to walk on the "cordes"...
You should try to make sense.
Do you know what is a corde ? ;-)
Reply With Quote