[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

ScottW wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...
So where is that happy middle ground that keeps us a safe as possible
(as in, "What risk are we willing to accept?" since we have to assume
some), and yet does not get us mired in ill-advised military action?

I'll put more trust in the IAEA than Seymour Hersh.
Even if the UN/Euro IAEA options fail...I don't see us getting "mired"
in Iran.

Fair enough. It doesn't matter, as bushie hasn't got enough power right
now to order a shoeshine for the Iranian president.

No...this will be an issue for Hillary though she hasn't shown any
reluctance to drop the bomb.

Nor would I be if necessary. I just don't think we're as close to that
as you might.

Just to clarify your varnished truth....I don't even read Coulter.

But you quote her. Hm. That doesn't seem likely.

Hardly...IIRC I said she had a point with leftists using victims
to voice their position while avoiding criticism.
Quite cowardly of them if you think about it.

Perhaps some leftists.

Or, as an alternative, I think it's quite cowardly of the (closet) gay,
drug-using rightists not to just come out of the closet. You are all
(closet) gay drug-users, yes?

I won't argue the point. Go back to the unvarnished truths of O'Reilly,
Malkin et al. They're more your speed. Feel better now, toopid?

I think Malkin generally does a good job of substantiating her
positions. Exactly what caused you to arrive at your conclusion
about her work? Familiarity or because someone told you
what to think?

I frankly get sick of the right being so black/white. You see it in
criticisms of Dems not all marching to the same drumbeat. I'm glad that
they don't. Malkin strikes me as one who is just so *damned* sure that
she's right.

If you want my opinion, read the _Lost Horizon_ quotes from another
post to you this evening. She may be *moderately* right on some points.
I do not see the world in black or white only. Usually, IME, it's
shades of gray.