Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
ScottW wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
The US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has not found conclusive evidence that
Iran is developing nuclear weapons, a US magazine has reported..
Let's just repeat that !
The US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has ***NOT*** found conclusive evidence
that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, a US magazine has reported.
Veteran investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, writing in The New Yorker, cites a
secret CIA report based on intelligence such as satellite images.
Seymour Hersh, admitted liar and manipulator of the truth.
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/features/11719/
Of course there is no "conclusive" evidence...just like there wasn't
anything conclusive about NK... and some people still question if they
actually
accomplished a nuclear fueled explosion.
Hersh loves to spin things just his way with enough subjectivity using
words
like "conclusive" to manipulate those who want to hear what he has to
say.
You're being duped...and you seem to be quite happy about it.
OTOH, toopid, we went to war in Iraq without any conclusive evidence of
WMD, and you seem quite happy about that.
Perhaps you can't remember that I felt there were sufficient other
reasons to take out Saddam, not all of which were strictly for your
selfish interests.
So where is that happy middle ground that keeps us a safe as possible
(as in, "What risk are we willing to accept?" since we have to assume
some), and yet does not get us mired in ill-advised military action?
I'll put more trust in the IAEA than Seymour Hersh.
Even if the UN/Euro IAEA options fail...I don't see us getting "mired"
in Iran.
And I do get sick of the right's always attacking the media.
as I get sick of the media attacking the right...
You want
to talk about fascist attempts at thought control...
Go back to the unvarnished truths of Coulter, O'Reilly, Malkin et al.
They're more your speed.
Just to clarify your varnished truth....I don't even read Coulter.
ScottW