Arny Krueger wrote:

Only that in quite sujective A-B tests, only those with a tin ear
could not hear the vast difference between CD and SACD.

There are no known CDs and SACDs that were mastered identically and
comparably, subject only to the differences in the media. . It would
be quite easy to do this, but in fact there are no known instances
of it.

It is quite easy to switch back and forth between CD and SACD on
hybrid SACDs. The difference is dramatic. Nice try, though.

The layers aren't the identical same recording. Nice try, though.

Of course not. One is SACD, and one is regular CD. The regular CD layer
is equal to or better sounding than that on a regular CD. (I've compared.)
The SACD layer blows it away. So the SACD layer is superior sounding to
the CD layer or to the sound on a regular CD. What's your point?

Man, what a pile of convoluted logic. Yeah...IT'S A CONSPIRACY!

It's called business as usual.

What business? To substitute a superior sounding format for an inferior
one? At roughly the same price? THOSE *******S!

Look out for the black helicopters!

--
Better than hearing "Lady Day", or checking in at Monterey...