[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Jenn wrote:
In article . com,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article om,
"ScottW" wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:


You do understand that single parenthood isn't always a lifestyle
choice, right?

Sure...would you advocate a different set of benefits and support for

the widow vs a divorced or never married parent?

ScottW

Nope; certainly not for divorced, as that's often not a choice either.

Lets amend divorce laws...the one who files automatically has all
financial responsibility for the kids. That will fix that.

ScottW

I see. So a man beats his wife (or vice-versa) and the wife files for
divorce and she's 100% financially liable?

Perhaps you should think this through some more ;-)

In toopid's world, it's kind of like sharia marriage.

The husband, for example, could suddenly become an abusive alcoholic, a
child abuser, or (as in the case of Haggard) a drug-using, cheating
liar.

If Mrs. Haggard doesn't 'stand by her man' though, and she files for
divorce, those children are now all her responsibility.

This is another example of toopid's 'logic.' He's actually a religious
nut-job, or at least shows strong tendencies in that direction.

He can never credibly speak out against sharia again.