[Walt]

Radium wrote:
Richard Crowley wrote:

Then you have clearly wandered off into the field of
magic and have left technology behind.

How so? What is "magical" [or non-technological] about a monoaural WMA
file with a sample-rate of 44.1 khz and whose audio has the same
sample-rate in its compressed and uncompressed form?

A 44.1khz sample rate in a 20kbps data stream?

Kinda like 44 pounts of **** in a 20 pound bag. Get it?

//Walt