Arny said:

Marc Phillips wrote:
Arny said:

Marc Phillips wrote:
Arny said:

dave weil wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 13:07:59 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

dave weil wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 06:17:58 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion you
wrote:

Marc Phillips wrote:
Arny said:

Marc Phillips wrote:
Arny said:


Marc Phillips wrote:

For the current state of the art in headphone design,
check out Sennheiser's brand-new HD-650. I just tried a
pair, and they are really amazing.

Of course, they are new, they cost more money, and they are
retreads of past find efforts, with just a little more
techno-glitz.

Poor Arny. You know, your HD-580s really aren't that bad,
especially considering your low-rez system.

OK Phillips, since you've just clearly made the claim that
the system I use with my 580's is "low-rez", list its
components.

If you can't accurately list the system I listen to with my
580's, then you've just been caught lying, again.

Shut the **** up, Internet geek.

Phillips, thanks for admitting once again that you didn't know
what you were talking about. You were lying, again. You've just
made my day!

Shame about your low expectations regarding your life...

Weil, shame about your inability to realize that there is life
outside of RAO, and life outside of sad cases like Marc Phillips.

This is just an absurd statement, considering the context of my
comments.

It's perfectly reasonable, Weil. You're in denial, as is your
habit.

Given your apparent expectations, I guess it was not a good
night for you last night.

Actually it was a good night. Once again, you're completely
off-base.

Then, I'd hate to see how grouchy and mean you are after a bad
night, Weil.

We're still waiting for you to tell us about your specific
experiences with the HD-650s, liar.

Say what? I made no such claims.

Phillips, we're still waiting for you to tell us the details of my
audio system. You know the one I use with my HD 580s. After all
you to told us about your specific experiences it,

Krueger, we're still waiting for you to tell us why you think Quad
ESLs were designed to be used with SS amps when Quad themselves
introduced a 30 wpc tube amp to mate with them. What's it been, a
year?

What are you talking about, Phillips?

That's clearly a false claim related to the Quad ESL-63s.

How can you call it a false claim when you don't know what I'm talking about?

Is that possible?

************************************************
Message 25 in thread
From: Arny Krueger )
Subject: So, real question about digitizing 15 kHz


View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Date: 2003-11-25 13:40:07 PST


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
ScottW said:

That Krell is now effortlessly driving
a pair of Quad 63's. Sweet sounds .

Now I'm going to tease you, Scott, by telling you that Quads really love tube
amplification!

Interesting fantasy, given that they were overtly designed to work well with
SS amplifiers.
*************************************************


And now you're telling someone to avoid a product you've never heard,
basically because it's out of your price range.

Who says its out of my price range? Got any proof to back that up with?

Your avoidance of my initial question?


Your little debating
trade trick about the quality of your system has nothing to do with
anything.

Marc Phillips, aren't you the one who just published an evaluation of the
system I use with my HD-580s? You know, the system that you can't describe
properly?

Okay. Tell us about your hi-rez system that you use the HD-580s with.

WARNING: This is a trap!


I do know that you've listed your equipment here several
times, and not a single thing you own is worth a ****.

Phillips, all we know about you for sure is that you can drop names. You
won't even tell us who you really are.

Who's this "us"? Do you mean "you," Arnold Krueger, Internet geek? I think
that's what you're really saying, that you don't know if I am who I say I am.
Meanwhile, I defer to the several other people here who have been to my home,
and even the one or two people who have seen my driver's license just in case
you were stupid enough to bring this up.


You have mentioned a C-J preamp once or twice, but I'm sure you borrowed
it.

Sorry man, but that C-J is my personal property, sitting about 20 feet from
where I am right now.

And which model is it again? And the serial number? I can check easily
enough.


I guess it really "makes your day" when I layman like me makes an
audio wannabe like you look like the poseur you are.

Aren't you the Marc Phillips "published author" with his own web site?

Yes, I've had short stories published in literary mags, I've had music reviews
published in audio magazines, and I've had audio reviews published in music
magazines. I've also doctored screenplays, and I'm currently writing a book.

Or,
is the Marc Phillips who writes those lame articles as The Vinyl Anachronist
really someone else?

You mean those articles that generated so much e-mail that I had to start a new
screenname...this one...just to handle the audio stuff separately (which made
you believe, moron that you are, that I got into trouble with my old
screenname, which I still use every day)?

http://www.furious.com/perfect/vinylanachronist.html

Inquiring minds want to know...

As always, thanks for the plug. Every time you do it, someone else e-mails me
telling me that they enjoy the articles. They also tend to ask me if you're
just acting, or if you're really this sad.

Boon