[[email protected]]

Radium wrote:
Richard Crowley wrote:
What is your problem?

It always helps to get input from those who obviously know a lot more
than me.

Which, in the past, you have made a habit out of either
ignoring outright or confabulating into such blithering
nonsense as to render it essentially useless.

Where's the use in that? How "scientific" is that?

You have also made a career out of spatting ill-founded
personal opinions as "fact." Your ongoing declarations
about how FM synthesis is the best or worst or whatever
is notable not only for its frequency and poor factual basis,
but its complete uselessness. No one, absolutely no one
gives a ****.