"ScottW" wrote in message
...
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
ScottW wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
message
oups.com...
ScottW wrote:
Here in Ohio wrote:
On 8 Nov 2006 15:47:02 -0800, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
Trevor Wilson wrote:
**I'd like to talk to some of those Americans who called Michael
Moore a
traitor a few years ago, when he was suggesting that America
should not
attack Iraq. Back then, around 30% of Americans were against the
war.
Now,
the figures are substantially higher.
Most of those same people would still call Moore a traitor.
And they'd still be jingoistic idiots. :-)
Nah... we just don't like lying traitorous scumbags.
That's what endears you to me: a total unwillingness to change your
mind in the face of overwhelming evidence.
BTW, it would appear to me that calling people 'traitor' because they
disagree with you went out of vogue last Tuesday...;-)
It wasn't the disagreeing part by itself that tipped him over the
line as traitor. It was that he had to go on one of the world's
Using that definition, we have a 1-2 punch of traitors in bushie and
cheney.
Did you hear bushie talking about rummy? He tripped over himself a few
times before the story he wanted to finally came out.
I can't listen to him after he got all giddy at the idea of his amnesty
getting passed.
Hugh Hewitt has an interesting take on the election and how
the republicans blew it.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/H...ing_a_majority
Some take. His view "we didn't nuke em (the Dems, the Constitution, the
Senate protocol, the NYT) when we could have", so the gang of fourteen and
our erstwhile leaders are also traitors. Nice reading material you surround
yourself with there, Scott.