[Arny Krueger]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message
ps.com

After again being caught up in his own web of lies and deceptions, Shhhh!
I'm Listening to Reason!" (****R) has finally admitted that this is what
Steve Hoffman wrote about equalization:

"So, we use *graphic EQ's* to tailor the sound of our
*playback* systems, and we
use *Parametric EQ's* to tailor the sound of our *music.*
Right? Now, you have a
good point in which to start. Download (if you can) some
parametric EQ programs."

Graphic EQs for playback. Parametric EQs for music (i.e. source).

It seems you recently admitted that 1/3 band
graphic EQs won't cut it for playback.

There was no such *admission*. I have forthrightly said all along that if
there is a one size fits all form of equalization, the form I prefer, it is
the multi-band parametric equalizer. The downside of parametric eq is that
it has a longer or steeper learning curve. The upside is that it can more
closely match a wider range of needs.

(How many times
have you said "parametric EQs" in the past week?)

Search google. I'm sure its count is at least representative.

So Hoffman does not imply, but specifically states,
parametric EQs to tailor the *music.* Now we're back at
production EQ, as I've said (three times now).

I'm glad to see that you've finally admitted to a little truth, ****R

I haven't seen anybody argue that EQ is not used in production.

Someone tried. I think it was Trevor. Sorry you missed the fun.

I hate to tell you this (and I know you won't believe it
anyway) but you're talking out of both sides of your ass.

Prove it, with in-context quotes if you can.


So what good would it do to 'download' EQ programs?

False presumption noted.

no substantiative answer from ****R, just more BS.