Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"dizzy" wrote in message
wrote:
dizzy wrote:
wrote:
Secondly and more importantly if an audio consumer
tries to compensate for deficiences of records he
must end-up with an incredible mess.
Incorrect.
An invaluable contribution.
You are stupid.
My money is on equal parts of arrogant and senile.
==================================
Krueger reaches for his truly convincing and elegant
argument
My money is on equal parts of arrogant and senile.
Not senile enough to forget that every time you're asked
for a refernce to your experiments with ABX, accepted and
published in a professional journal, you develop instant
amnesia and quit the topic
Boredom puts me to sleep.
============================
Argument so far. Krueger about me:" My money is on equal parts of
arrogant and senile."
I answered: Not senile enough to forget that every time you're
asked
for a refernce to your experiments with ABX, accepted and
published in a professional journal, you develop instant
amnesia and quit the topic
His replica: " Boredom puts me to sleep.". Period.
Boredom is mutual but
it is audio website news that after all these years even the inventor
is bored with the topic of ABX as a tool for comparing audio
components.
Can we expect to see those your dentiments added tp the PCABX web site?
Can we also expect that you and your chapel members such as Sullivan et
al. will never again bother people to prove their preferences by an
"objective", "bias free", (and other such clever-clever cryptonyms)
"test"?
Ludovic Mirabel