[[email protected]]

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
wrote:

Krueger says:
Why not address the issues I raised, such as the fact that modern production
and reproduction chains are full of equalizers, just ones that aren't
user-adjustable.

A blanket, meaningless spout. Recording engineers do all kinds of
things. They use mikes to record. Should one use a mike at home to
record their records?

Adding background tracks to your recordings may help too. Recording
engineers do this as well. Les Paul would put his finger on the tape
spool to get different effects. That's apparently worth a try.
Recording a solo backwards and then playing it forwards has been done
too...

That doesn't even begin to discuss chorus, phase shift, harmonizers,
aural exciters, and so on, or different effects from different mic
placement.

I hope Arny will let us know how to use these effects in our home
recordings as well.

High fidelity to Arny appears to mean absolute accuracy to the original
recording (unless it doesn't).
=================================

You got it. Advice from Arny: use equaliser at home. Equalisers are
good. Proof: engineers use them all the time making records. So you use
equaliser at home to deequalise what they equalised.
That will restore things to absolute accuracy. That what in
Krueger-pedia is also called Hi-Fi.
Ludovic Mirabel