"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message link.net...
"Jacob Kramer" wrote in message
om...

I don't know what he could have done differently based on what was known
at
the time.
With hindsight being 20/20 I'm sure we can think of things but that's
not
really fair.

As a factual matter it's possible to point out mistakes without saying
they shouldn't have been made. If you are unable to do this, that
would show an unreasonable bias toward Bush.

Not if I would hold the same standard for Democrat President or any other.

That's very generous of you, but it was a Republican and not a
Democrat that was president. This allows you to blame a Democrat,
Clinton, and hold a Republican blameless, Bush. This is a double
standard and a bias that also doesn't make any sense from an empirical
view. Whether he make mistakes or not is an empirical question, not a
moral question. That you are unwilling to observe the mistakes he has
made is a very clear indication of your bias.