View Single Post
  #21   Report Post  
S888Wheel
 
Posts: n/a
Default S888wheel says: When cornered, I Just change my story!

From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 3:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"

Date: 4/25/2004 3:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

S888Wheel wrote:
cornered, I Just change my story!
From: "Arny Krueger"

Date: 4/25/2004 3:15 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Nousaine wrote:
"Arny Krueger"
wrote:



S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"

Date: 4/25/2004 1:22 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Last week S888wheel got spanked for posting the following:

From:
(S888Wheel)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:09:02 GMT
Message-ID: f7Ifc.433$gL1.21407@attbi_s54

"The reproduction of a 6hz tone (I guess it could be called a
tone) would be utterly useless."

This week, he's in full-tilt revisionism mode:

From:
(S888Wheel)
Date: 25 Apr 2004 16:03:16 GMT
Message-ID:

"Please try to get your facts straight. I said a 6hz tone is
useless in highend."

You could always post a comment about this in RAHE where these
posts were made. Oh, no you can't. You were banned from RAHE for
being an asshole. How funny is it that you lurk on a Usenet
group from which you were banned?

So S888wheel, are you saying that my history with RAHE's
moderators justifies your dissembling?

I'd say you suffer from RAHE envy.

I'd say that I know where to look to see you being your sweet
self, S888wheel.

I guess you and
Tom share a common problem with numbers. This is what Tom said
that sparked my comment..."And here, Mr Wheeler says that a 10
Hz subwoofer is "useless."


I guess this form of revisionism is OK with you since you love
to do the same thing.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

So, clarification of context and the dropping of an adverb is
revisionism
to you.

Wouldn't limiting the discussion to just the "highend" be a
change of context? BTW for your future reference S888wheel, you
should know that "highend" is actually two words.

Furthermore s888wheel, you need to explain why people in the high
end should be satisfied with lower quality reproduction than the
best that is reasonably possible.

But changing significant numbers is not.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

When s888wheel, are you going to start taking responsibility for
your own actions?

I must aplogize to Mr. Wheel. I did not say that a 10 Hz signal
was useless. He said anything below 20 Hz was useless.

When I tried to pin s888wheel down to a specific frequency or range
of frequencies where the purported uselessness commenced, it
became difficult or impossible to get a straight answer from of
him.

Actually it became impossible to get a straight question from Arny.


This is ludicrous. When I asked for the frequency where you thought
this "uselessness" effect started, you refused to provide an answer.


Cite the question that you think was a meaningful question.


No, in the face of all of your dissembling and straw man arguements
s888wheel, it's clear that you are incapable of a good faith discussion.
There's no need to cite anything if you lack good faith.


Bottom line is you can't cite any such question.


But that didn't stop him from inventing answer and then attacking
it.


I'll give you a second chance s888wheel. At what frequency does
further extensions of bass response become useless?


And I'll give you a second chance to clarify the question.


I just asked a reasonable question s888wheel,


Wrong.

one that you have found no
fault with, Wrong again. I just didn'y cite the fault I find with it. I

thought I would show you a little respect and presume you could figure out what
the obvious fault was given the history of this topic. My bad for giving you
that respect and thinking you might be able to see the faults with your
question on your own.

one that seems more than clear enough.

Wrong again. I'll spell it out for you since you weren't able to see the
problem with your question. I made my claim about 6 hz with the assumption that
it would be taken within the context of high end audio and the recording and
playback of music. Clearly some people on RAHE find 6 hz tones useful for
things that exist outside of those parameters. Now if you wish to discuss the
topic of what I think is useful in the way of low frequency extension we must
establish the parameters of use.



No, in the face of all of your continuing dissembling and recent straw man
arguements s888wheel, it's clear that you are incapable of a good faith
discussion.


Same old juggling act from RAO's resident clown. Good show.