AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - S888wheel says: When cornered, I Just change my story!

S888Wheel wrote:
cornered, I Just change my story!
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 3:15 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Nousaine wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 1:22 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Last week S888wheel got spanked for posting the following:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:09:02 GMT
Message-ID: f7Ifc.433$gL1.21407@attbi_s54

"The reproduction of a 6hz tone (I guess it could be called a
tone) would be utterly useless."

This week, he's in full-tilt revisionism mode:

From: (S888Wheel)
Date: 25 Apr 2004 16:03:16 GMT
Message-ID:

"Please try to get your facts straight. I said a 6hz tone is
useless in highend."

You could always post a comment about this in RAHE where these
posts were made. Oh, no you can't. You were banned from RAHE for
being an asshole. How funny is it that you lurk on a Usenet group
from which you were banned?

So S888wheel, are you saying that my history with RAHE's moderators
justifies your dissembling?

I'd say you suffer from RAHE envy.

I'd say that I know where to look to see you being your sweet self,
S888wheel.

I guess you and
Tom share a common problem with numbers. This is what Tom said
that sparked my comment..."And here, Mr Wheeler says that a 10 Hz
subwoofer is "useless."

I guess this form of revisionism is OK with you since you love to
do the same thing.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

So, clarification of context and the dropping of an adverb is
revisionism
to you.

Wouldn't limiting the discussion to just the "highend" be a change
of context? BTW for your future reference S888wheel, you should
know that "highend" is actually two words.

Furthermore s888wheel, you need to explain why people in the high
end should be satisfied with lower quality reproduction than the
best that is reasonably possible.

But changing significant numbers is not.

So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine
justifies your dissembling?

When s888wheel, are you going to start taking responsibility for
your own actions?

I must aplogize to Mr. Wheel. I did not say that a 10 Hz signal was
useless. He said anything below 20 Hz was useless.

When I tried to pin s888wheel down to a specific frequency or range
of frequencies where the purported uselessness commenced, it became
difficult or impossible to get a straight answer from of him.

Actually it became impossible to get a straight question from Arny.

This is ludicrous. When I asked for the frequency where you thought this
"uselessness" effect started, you refused to provide an answer.

But that didn't stop him from inventing answer and then attacking it.

I'll give you a second chance s888wheel. At what frequency does further
extensions of bass response become useless?