S888Wheel wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 4/25/2004 1:22 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:
Last week S888wheel got spanked for posting the following:
From: (S888Wheel)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:09:02 GMT
Message-ID: f7Ifc.433$gL1.21407@attbi_s54
"The reproduction of a 6hz tone (I guess it could be called a tone)
would be utterly useless."
This week, he's in full-tilt revisionism mode:
From: (S888Wheel)
Date: 25 Apr 2004 16:03:16 GMT
Message-ID:
"Please try to get your facts straight. I said a 6hz tone is useless
in highend."
You could always post a comment about this in RAHE where these posts
were made. Oh, no you can't. You were banned from RAHE for being an
asshole. How funny is it that you lurk on a Usenet group from which
you were banned?
So S888wheel, are you saying that my history with RAHE's moderators
justifies your dissembling?
I'd say you suffer from RAHE envy.
I'd say that I know where to look to see you being your sweet self,
S888wheel.
I guess you and
Tom share a common problem with numbers. This is what Tom said that
sparked my comment..."And here, Mr Wheeler says that a 10 Hz
subwoofer is "useless."
I guess this form of revisionism is OK with you since you love to do
the same thing.
So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine justifies your
dissembling?
So, clarification of context and the dropping of an adverb is revisionism
to you.
Wouldn't limiting the discussion to just the "highend" be a change of
context? BTW for your future reference S888wheel, you should know that
"highend" is actually two words.
Furthermore s888wheel, you need to explain why people in the high end should
be satisfied with lower quality reproduction than the best that is
reasonably possible.
But changing significant numbers is not.
So S888wheel, are you saying that your history with Nousaine justifies your
dissembling?
When s888wheel, are you going to start taking responsibility for your own
actions?