Stuart Krivis wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006 10:56:54 -0700, wrote:
So you're still convinced that telling me how my stereo sounds, without
actually hearing it yourself, is the way to go in this argument?
Why not? It isn't going to make any difference. You're a true
believer, as evidenced by your choice of (and defense of) such
horribly flawed gear.
Actually, I have owned a lot of different equipment over the years
which I have enjoyed, and which come from completely different audio
philosophies. For instance, I love my Naim CDX2 CD player:
http://audioenz.co.nz/2006/vinyl_level.shtml
I also love electrostatic speakers, Naim amplification, BBC-licensed
loudspeakers, etc.
But don't let your own misguided preconceptions get in the way of the
truth. I have my opinions on audio published. You have your bull****,
which is becoming more and more improbable.
You're dumber than I originally thought, and I originally thought you
were really ****ing dumb.
Heh. I'm not the one with the wacko amps, speakers, and the wooden
phono cartridge.
We don't know what you have, do we? Let's see if you have the balls to
tell us.
I'm just betting you have all kinds of fancy wires, cables, and power
cords too. Any Peter Belt gear? A bottle of Brilliant Pebbles? C'mon,
fess up. You know you've got them.
I have a question for you. Why do objectivists, while in a debate,
choose to make up things out of thin air about their opponents? Don't
they realize it undermines everything they stand for? Don't they know
it makes them look like idiots? TIA.
Boon