dave weil wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 05:52:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

snip

This is an extraordinary claim, that contradicts the
published
literature on human hearing sensitivity.

In fact Atkinson presented zero independent evidence to support his
claims about infrasonic perception.

snip

Neither did you regarding the importance of 6hz in musical
programming.

Sure I did, in another post. I provided a reference showing the top 30
commercial recordings in terms of subsonic bass, as prepared by someone
else.

You can't even prove that your system can reproduce such
a low frequency,

Delusions of omniscience noted. Weil you haven't got a clue about what I can
or cannot do, particularly with the assistance of my friends.

Since you think you know it all, why don't list my inventory of measurement
microphones, microphone preamps, digital audio interfaces, broadband analog
audio measuring devices, audio measurement software, and etc. Believe or
not, a representative list of can be assembled from Usenet and the Internet.
Therefore, it's reasonable for me to hold you responsible for knowing this,
particularly since you clearly claimed that it does not exist.

nor have you shown any dbts that indicate that 6hz is "perceptable" in a
proper dbt.

It's nothing like a subtle effect. There is plenty of evidence that strong
audio signals in the infrasonic range including 6 Hz can stimulate reliable
perception, involuntary stimulus of bodily functions, illness, injury and
death.

BTW, why did you stop using your spell-checker and Quotefix?

Never.