MINe 109 wrote:
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
MINe 109 wrote:
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
John Atkinson wrote:
dave weil wrote in message
. ..
On 18 Apr 2004 17:11:36 -0700,
(John Atkinson) wrote:
So, when you typed "gooogle" you didn't mean
"Google," Mr. Krueger, what were you referring to?
Mr. Atkinson, he was just parroting Scott Wheeler's misspelling
of "google".
That's what I had assumed.
So what's your problem, Atkinson?
Why aren't you showing a little concern for the rather significant
audio issue raise in that thread?
You snipped the part where he did.
Roger.
That makes yours a nice question.
It makes it a non-issue at this time.
Doesn't sound quality mean anything to you?
He's the test guy at Stereophile. Maybe you've seen his work.
A lot of it is irrelevant to sound quality. He has a nasty tendency
that he shows in this thread - which is to obsess over things that
are meaningless in the larger scheme of things.
Like 6 Hz musical content?
I'll leave that people to determine with their own ears.
Atkinson, is it your position that the corruption of musical
timbres by infrasonic cut-offs is OK? Should it should be
tolerated, and even glorified if vinyl-playback and tubed
equipment evidences this audible coloration to a greater degree?
No loaded words there...
Want me to list out the loaded words in the posts I was responding
to? It makes a nice study in the one-sided nature of your posts,
Stephen.
That doesn't seem possible.
And the antecedent of "that" is???
While it is an improvement over your
reflexive flaming ("one-sided nature" my eye), your game of answering
misspellings literally is tedious and noisy.
It's not as tedious as trying to fix them or work around them.