[Harry Lavo]

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
oooo! An attack thread with my name in it! Goose...gander.

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

gy.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

odi
gy.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

.pr
odi
gy.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...
In article
,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

I would expect that vinyl uber alles advocates would
not
be
aware
of
any
of
these failings, since many of them seem to have a
built-in
"noise
gate"
in
their hearing, that cuts off small details and low
levels.

No, they don't.

Facts say otherwise. Live with it. I notice that Jenn
has
failed
the
noise
gate test two ways. First, she claimed that the Triangle
sample
cut
out
when
it didn't,

I offered to send you the screen shot. Do you want to see
it
or
not?

I can make one of my own any day I want to. Just take the
good
file,
delete
some of it, and do the screen dump.

Since you obviously don't trust me for some reason, how shall
I
prove
to
you that the file as I received it is how I say it is?


and then she didn't notice the cut out that was present
in
the
cutlery hanger sample.

She said and I quote:

"I get a nice 9 1/2 second ring."

You don't hear it for 9 1/2 seconds?

Yeah, but it cuts off before things get really interesting.

All I said was that I hear a nice 9 1/2 second ring, as
opposed
to
your
file. IOW, I stated the facts exactly as they are.

Actually, "things as they are" involve my file being far longer
than
you've
ever heard it play, right?

Yep.

First off Jenn, you just indicted yourself for judging my file and
publishing your judgements of my file, fully knowing that you have
never
heard my file in its entirety.

Incorrect, yet again. Check the record. I commented before I knew
that
the file is longer than what I heard. If you disagree, quote the
record.

Your last comment on my file was posted at 9:29pm last night, in a
discussion of your comparison of it to the cutlery file:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...8575d0bbb6d584

In this file a comparison of the two files was invited and Jenn
responded to
the invitation.

I responded to it without comment on the length or quality of your file.
Any normal person can see that, Arny.


You have known that my file was at least 4 seconds long since you
quoted
that fact in a reply to a post from "Mr. Fox" that you posted at 9:24
pm
last night:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...13bd147769869d

In this post Jenn quoted a post that confirmed my file was 4 seconds
long.

Correct. And my comments about the quality and length of your file came
BEFORE that, Arny.

Jenn had previously said that she heard only a shorter segment of it. To
the
best of my knowlege, Jenn has never reported hearing the whole 4 seconds
of
my file.

Correct.


End of story.

OMG...the density is startling. Where in the above sites did I
comment
on the quality of your files? Stop lying.

Denial of the obvious, noted.

Normal people can read and see that I commented about the length and
quality of your files BEFORE I could have known that the file was longer
than I was hearing on my computer. You can't. Draw your own
conclusions.

So what are you saying Jenn, that 9:29 when you commented quality, is
before 9:24 when you quoted the correct length?

Interesting. ;-)

Arny, you really are pathetic. You are twisting all this in an attempt to
savage Jenn, when anybody who followed the thread knows she is telling the
truth. You really make a mockery of your Christianity. Better you should
spend time getting a psychologist to work with you on your need for
self-agrandizement.