[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

gy.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

odi
gy.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

I would expect that vinyl uber alles advocates would not be
aware
of
any
of
these failings, since many of them seem to have a built-in
"noise
gate"
in
their hearing, that cuts off small details and low levels.

No, they don't.

Facts say otherwise. Live with it. I notice that Jenn has
failed
the
noise
gate test two ways. First, she claimed that the Triangle sample
cut
out
when
it didn't,

I offered to send you the screen shot. Do you want to see it or
not?

I can make one of my own any day I want to. Just take the good
file,
delete
some of it, and do the screen dump.

Since you obviously don't trust me for some reason, how shall I
prove
to
you that the file as I received it is how I say it is?


and then she didn't notice the cut out that was present in the
cutlery hanger sample.

She said and I quote:

"I get a nice 9 1/2 second ring."

You don't hear it for 9 1/2 seconds?

Yeah, but it cuts off before things get really interesting.

All I said was that I hear a nice 9 1/2 second ring, as opposed to
your
file. IOW, I stated the facts exactly as they are.

Actually, "things as they are" involve my file being far longer than
you've
ever heard it play, right?

Yep.

First off Jenn, you just indicted yourself for judging my file and
publishing your judgements of my file, fully knowing that you have never
heard my file in its entirety.

Incorrect, yet again. Check the record. I commented before I knew that
the file is longer than what I heard. If you disagree, quote the record.

Your last comment on my file was posted at 9:29pm last night, in a
discussion of your comparison of it to the cutlery file:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...8575d0bbb6d584

You have known that my file was at least 4 seconds long since you quoted
that fact in a reply to a post from "Mr. Fox" that you posted at 9:24 pm
last night:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...13bd147769869d

End of story.

OMG...the density is startling. Where in the above sites did I comment
on the quality of your files? Stop lying.