MINe 109 wrote:
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
John Atkinson wrote:
dave weil wrote in message
. ..
On 18 Apr 2004 17:11:36 -0700,
(John Atkinson) wrote:
So, when you typed "gooogle" you didn't mean
"Google," Mr. Krueger, what were you referring to?
Mr. Atkinson, he was just parroting Scott Wheeler's misspelling of
"google".
That's what I had assumed.
So what's your problem, Atkinson?
Why aren't you showing a little concern for the rather significant
audio issue raise in that thread?
You snipped the part where he did.
Roger.
Doesn't sound quality mean anything to you?
He's the test guy at Stereophile. Maybe you've seen his work.
A lot of it is irrelevant to sound quality. He has a nasty tendency that he
shows in this thread - which is to obsess over things that are meaningless
in the larger scheme of things.
Atkinson, is it your position that the corruption of musical timbres
by infrasonic cut-offs is OK? Should it should be tolerated, and
even glorified if vinyl-playback and tubed equipment evidences this
audible coloration to a greater degree?
No loaded words there...
Want me to list out the loaded words in the posts I was responding to? It
makes a nice study in the one-sided nature of your posts, Stephen.