Poopie's problem with music
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
. ..
Or when he bought the lowest priced SACD player available
Harry, isn't it true that you said that the Pioneer universal player was
capable of showing the benefits of the SACD format?
Absolutely not. You obviously are letting your opinion of me get in the way
of what I've said....at least three times on usenet, including RAO. SACD is
the weakest format played by the 578a. It's conversion to PCM destroys the
ambience readily available on native DSD decoding players. It is its DVD-A
that is really strong, and its CD acceptable.
Pay attention.
and then proclaimed he couldn't hear any difference between SACD and CD,
Never happened.
Bull****!
so those of us who did hear a difference (on better players, and possibly
with better systems) were "wrong".
Reliance on inherently flawed sighted evaluations noted.
Versus never having done a careful comparison test (albeit sighted) of SACD
vs CD at all, as I did Arny, using carefully selected, identically sourced
materials? Go back and read the RAHE archives. You had your opinion before
you bought the SACD machine that SACD contributed no audible difference, and
you've continued to assert that since. When challenged as to what kind of
(non-computer) testing you've done to assert that, you've ducked.
|